Carlo Lingiardi

Monday, April 24, 2017

HUMAN BRAIN COMPLEXITY 2

Last night I watched again one of my most beloved movies: Lucy, I love it because in a very simple and cinematographic (visual) manner it talks about the powers of the human (our) brain, how much of its capacity we can now utilize and the potential we have in front of us.

I specifically love the fact that the super-intelligent Lucy (100% use of her brain capacities) tells to the police inspector – in the car with her – that “we never really die” that’s directly quoted from today’s quantum physics.

With this post I start a series today, to show – beyond any doubt – how complex and still completely unknown is what sits between our two ears.

My goal (not too secret nor surprising) is to have my readers understand that a neuropsychological assessment is a complete crappy method to figure out the way someone uses this organ and therefore that the assessments done on me (and on my use of this organ) are all a pile of bullshit spread on paper.

I start today with something very similar to few of my posts in the recent past and I can anticipate that it’ll be followed by posts about neuropsychology (the specialty in bullshit).

Since my N.D.E. has increased my intelligence, logic and learning abilities, I put here with this post links to other websites and a longer Youtube video in full support of my claims.

In few days I’ll talk about those who make these assessments on me and all those who thought it best to take money from me and from my children, including what kind of afterlife they are looking at unless they realize it’s best to return to my treasures all (I mean ALL of it) the money they have stolen from me.

Saturday, April 22, 2017

HUMAN BRAIN COMPLEXITY 1

With this post I start a series today to show – beyond any doubt – how complex and still completely unknown is what sits between our two ears, or the brain.

My goal (not too secret or surprising) is to have my readers understand that a neuropsychological assessment is a complete crappy method to figure out the way someone uses this organ and therefore that the assessments done on me (and on my organ) are all a pile of bullshit spread on paper.

I start today with something very similar to few of my posts in the recent past and it’ll be followed by posts about how much of our brains we truly use and why, plus one specifically dedicated to neuropsychology (crappy specialty).

Since my N.D.E. has increased my intelligence, logic and learning abilities I put here with this post links to other websites and a short Youtube video in full support of my claims.

Saturday, April 15, 2017

MY AFTERLIFE CONNECTION

As it stands, I did post several times about the Zeitgeist movies

However I was recently watching them again and – through my connection with afterlife, I understood that the part completely overlooked by the filmmakers, is the one that regards the explanation of the so called Holy Shroud (several posts in the past about it too):

As I’m watching these Zeitgeist movies again, I must admit that the astrological explanation of Jesus – and of his several predecessors – kind of makes sense, just like the one that claims that Jesus was used by the Roman Empire to keep the people quiet because focused on something else.

What the Zeitgeist people cannot explain in any way, shape or form is the actual presence still today 2.000+ years later of the shroud, after having survived a destroying fire that burned everything around it and having been studied by the most advanced scientists who used the latest instruments available for centuries, without any explanation of the possible way it could have been made centuries earlier.

To me it’s the simple existence of the Shroud that confirms the real/true existence of Jesus and of his otherworldly capacities.

It’s just like when you look for some proof to justify the real existence of something/one or fact told in ancient books, it’s often sufficient to find just ONE piece of evidence to justify the entire story/report found in that ancient book.

So, why the heck do people (atheists) spend time and money in the (futile) attempt to prove that Jesus was just some Jew who somehow built a followership against the Roman Empire to be killed with crucifixion?

I mean, with billions of people all over the world expressing followership and faith for Jesus, what were they hoping to express and prove? If you can think to the answer to this question, please put it here below my post.

Friday, April 14, 2017

SAINT THOMAS THE APOSTLE

As I’m re-reading some of the sacred scriptures, I realize that all the agnostics do have a saint in Saint Thomas, in Italian there’s a refrain that rhymes with the words Thomas and nose (Tommaso e naso) that uses the meaning of being curious and wanting to “stuck your nose in it” that I learned when I was 5 or 6 y/o and can never forget.

The fact that the disciple Thomas couldn’t believe that his master Jesus had resorted had him be present when Jesus appeared again to all his disciples and Thomas put his fingers in the wound in Jesus’s chest.

I cannot remember having seen Jesus myself – even if as soon as I woke up from my 2 months long coma I said so – but I do remember well the terms of my agreement done with Jesus about my reason to keep living (my two treasures) no matter if I was told that it would have surely be painful for me to stay here on earth, very much of what I know is due to my uninterrupted contact with the Afterlife…..maybe one day I’ll post here what I know about Jesus, the Jew and his parents.

The first person who told me that she believed I was agnostic is Michele and I had to go see the meaning of this word because I never heard it before, I hope that you are going to enjoy the small collection of links to websites and the Youtubes too.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

SUPREME OEC DELIGHT

The improvements to the address book in OEC are so great that I never look nor miss the address book of Windows Outlook 2010 because the search for people by name, activity or location is super-easy and intuitive plus friendly.

This – together with the innumerable other improvements truly make OEC my best PC companion, in fact – no matter what I’m doing – it stays open all day long in the background, therefore whenever I receive a new message I hear it’s arrived and can look at it immediately.

This together to the soon arriving the IMAP capacity, is going to make OEC my best emailing software since the fools at Windows decided to give all their beautiful emailing programs with the arrival of windows 7 and al.

I put below the links to my posts on this same program done in the past, that already have plenty links to OEC websites and I only add the recommendation to get it as soon and as fast as you can to return to live in the wonderful emailing world of the past Windows environments.

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

REALITY IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER

While I’ve been talking about how much reality is created by our mind (or consciousness) I came across this concept (as expressed in one of the dozens of movies I watch all day long) that states that we all believe that we observe reality, things as they are, but what actually happens is that the mind interprets what the eyes see and gives it meaning; it’s only at this point, when meaning is assigned, that we can truly say we have seen something. In other words, what we see is as much in the mind as it is in reality. If you consider that the mind of a person from one culture is going to be different in many ways from the mind of a person from another culture, then you have the explanation for that most fundamental of all cross-cultural problems: the fact that two people look upon the same reality, the same example of behavior, and see two entirely different things.

Any behavior observed across the cultural divide, therefore, has to be interpreted in two ways:

· the meaning given to it by the person who does the action

· the meaning given to it by the person who observes the action

Only when these two meanings are the same do we have successful communication, successful in the sense that the meaning that was intended by the doer is the one that was understood by the observer. This idea makes me think very much to the losers who made my assessments, what the heck did they see (or understand) about me and my way to think and being logic?

They surely have seen someone else…….there must exist some logical reason to explain what they saw in me……….can’t tell if it’s my convinced belief in at least try once the therapy that I’m tired to name or if it truly works for TBI or because they didn’t want me to turn into a bum, living on the street.

These bums must have a pretty high social cost, because I don’t see any in court when I’m there, in fact the only people I see are those with lots of money – like young kids with very large amounts of money either from inheritance or as a payoff from some accident they had – practically not only physically (only) disabled people like me but derelict young kids who have no idea of what to do with all of their money.

Talk about having a great job as a conservator, you can manage very large wealth without having gone through any kind of formal and superior education and therefore having less than zero experience of working in companies of various sizes, in different fields and geographical locations (even if just here in the USA).

But this idea of reality being in the mind of the beholder makes me think again that it’s us with our expectations and ways to look at things that do influence reality, or make new things happen.

Do any of my readers know that I think of good things to happen to both my two last neuropsychologists and my two conservators? I best not say what I’ve been thinking because it’s way too related to what I had said before about our own God/consciousness and to what Jesus showed to us when dyeing on the cross.

Labels