Last January I posted a story based on my new possibility
and ability to make researches and learn about how we are all connected to each
other, no matter the geographical distance or even the time http://lingiaca.blogspot.com/2015/01/connections.html in a way we truly
are all like brothers, much like what these videos show and what my good friend
Iacopo sustains in his research, in fact - given the enormous amount of spare
time I have I could list here very many situations in my life that fully
demonstrate some kind of connections among people across the world and across
very different times. The only examples I want to make are that the headhunter
who positioned me to have my job at Deckers, died few weeks after my
appointment for brain cancer and one of my very early girlfriends in Italy broke
her hip on the same day that I broke mine in California, I can go on with
examples of this kind with plenty others, also related to my former work
environment, but since I found these two videos that seem to be perfect to me
to demonstrate this topic I conclude this post with the link to that post about
connections and very few consistent links:
God made me a warrior, I found my beautiful soul mate, we were gifted with my two treasures in approval, while in a coma due to TBI for 2 long months, I met with Jesus and all my Catholic upbringing came back, I now have a full conservator, but my family will forever be part of me. NEVER FORGET THAT ALL I SAY HERE IS THE PRODUCT OF MY INJURED BRAIN I WAS ASSESSED SEVERAL TIMES TO BE UNABLE TO MANAGE MY MONEY.
Labels
- Dante Alighieri (5)
- Enbrel (6)
- Italy (16)
- Love (49)
- Medical (16)
- movie review (90)
- Music (13)
- My history (91)
- Personal (343)
- Philosophy (361)
- Popes resignations (1)
- Quantums (58)
- TBI recovery (67)
Wednesday, April 08, 2015
Tuesday, April 07, 2015
?? JUVENILE??
For the longest time I haven't been able to understand the
reason why the court in charge to decide my life destiny is the juvenile court
in Ventura and pretty much all of the other individuals present for the
appointment of a conservator are minors who look very mentally retarded to me,
but obviously have large amounts of money at their disposal and by assigning a
conservator to those kids the court attempts to ensure that those "retarded
kids" won't be able to totally waste their monetary funds before they
become decent enough to understand the value of what they own, so that there
won't be any risk of them wasting it all away.
My bare presence in that court has forced me to look into
the conservatorship laws and become a supporter of the NASGA that helped me to
understand that the lawyers who worked on these laws made it absolutely sure
that they never could be trapped in their own "legislative
creatures".
This also makes it more than clear and obvious that the
members of that juvenile court are completely trapped in the confusion of
applying such confusing and unfair laws, it goes without me saying that while I
do respect those judges I completely understand that to decide that a former, successful
company president of 51 years of age should never be put at the same level of
minor kids who are so retarded that cannot even form an idea, nor express it in
intelligible words.
Following the law to the letter this court assigned to me a
defense attorney by the name of Mary, who immediately saw that I'm not even
close to need to have a conservator and went so far to make the joke that my
"conservator won the lottery ticket of her life" by being assigned to
me as conservator. Given that very
surprisingly for me (an Italian born, Catholic by default) I had what's named
today a NDE when I was told to have made an agreement to survive, against all
the odds with Jesus Christ, I now can say with great confidence that since as
we die we see our entire lives like in a documentary and our newly acquired
universal intelligence gives the ability to pinpoint each and every time we
hurt someone else to decide what kind of afterlife we are going to have in
eternity, I do feel very sorry for quite a number of people who put me in this
position of pain and humiliation, simply because I know (for personal and
direct experience) that unless they correct their wrongs done to me and to my
treasures, while living their eternal existence as souls will be spent in some
"hellish" way, or place.
Given that I made an agreement with Jesus and I've always
believed in His true existence, I'm very confident that Jesus will be at my
side in my support when I'll be in court in few weeks and I can only be sorry
for those who think that I'm a brain injured man who says this, you will understand,
experience and see when you'll die, sadly nobody will ever know until death arrives.
- https://www.caring.com/articles/adult-guardianship
- http://www.elderlawanswers.com/guardianship-and-conservatorship-12096
- http://www.sfsuperiorcourt.org/divisions/probate/conservators-of-adults
- http://www.canhr.org/factsheets/legal_fs/html/fs_ProbateConservatorship.htm
- http://info.legalzoom.com/legal-guardianship-adult-california-20973.html
- http://www.scscourt.org/self_help/probate/conservatorship/conservatorship_overview.shtml
- http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/conservatorships-adult-guardianships-30063.html
- http://www.courts.ca.gov/selfhelp-conservatorship.htm
Sunday, April 05, 2015
POUNDING ON THE SAME STONE
I truly wish that my immensely and forever beloved mother of our treasures could listen to me like she was doing for decades before my injury, however it's sadly clear that she now prefers to listen to someone condemned to eternal hell (B.) in fact she just returned a small box of Glutathione I had purchased using my insufficient monthly charity to be delivered - for safety - to where she lives - away from my disabled condition. Therefore for everyone's peace of mind I put here few links to real medical research (NIH) websites that support the use of what I was dreaming to have (glutathione) but that she sent back as return to Amazon.
Given that both the video and the websites I put here aren't just commercial sites that offer some product in exchange for your money, but truly report what this simple and natural product can do to an injured brain, I hope that I won't need to say anything about this anymore.
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3555113/
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2818465/
- http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035264
- http://www.abcam.com/products?selected.researchAreas=Neuroscience--Neurology+process--Neurogenesis&selected.targetName=Glutathione+Synthetase&selected.productType=Primary+antibodies
- http://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/37/12242.full
- https://healingbraininjurynaturally.wordpress.com/
- http://www.nature.com/jcbfm/journal/v28/n7/full/jcbfm200815a.html
Saturday, April 04, 2015
JUST TO MAKE MONEY ??
Given that I haven't been able to receive - even as a
trial/test - the patented perispinal Enbrel that I've been talking about here and proving
with dozens of links to official (NIH) websites I was thinking
to post that the perispinal Enbrel isn't true, because if it really was, it
would already be used in every hospital across the world AND by every MD with
at least half of a normal brain.
BUT as I was going through all my plenty posts (with all of their
links to real medical and research websites) I thought - as the
businessman I've been always - that the main/unique obstacle to the widespread
use of this true miracle is only the MD in dermatology Edward T. who dreams
that after his own death all of his wealth and money might open the doors to
heaven to his soul. I mentioned here earlier how money can affect our afterlife
as a soul (http://lingiaca.blogspot.com/2015/02/my-money.html),
I don't know (I'm surely not God) but from my personal experience (NDE) I
greatly doubt that this Edward will ever go through the doors of Heaven.
This is the very reason why I'm not going to delete any of
my plenty posts about this neurological recovery therapy, even if I have very
demeaning thoughts regarding anything "medical" (or the guess science) I cannot believe that this late in
human history we cannot yet at least reduce an inflammation, no matter where we
have it.
Therefore all I can say is that I'm sorry for you Edward and
for your eternal existence in your own hell, because you do have the ability to
forever reside in heaven and be together with people (souls) like Madam Curie,
Albert Einstein and J.S. Bach, who for different reasons gained access to
heaven and forever will enjoy where their acts when living on earth gave them
access to. All I can say now is to go to the 14 posts I specifically made (with their plenty
links and videos) and pray with me that our next president will not
only support (fund) stem cell research, but will also be blunt enough to oppose
the economical interests of the Big Pharma in the denial that a very
inexpensive medication such as Enbrel (Etanercept) will save billions to the
country (ours - USA) already penniless since a decade.
Friday, April 03, 2015
DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT
It just
so happens that a superior court listened ONLY to a Ph. D. in psychology, (fearful to say anything different
than what already said by his illustrious colleagues in my past) - rather than talking with me directly
for at least 2 minutes - decided to assign to me for the management of my hard
earned money a young woman who inherited such profitable occupation from her
mother, who was abandoned through divorce by her husband as soon as he realized
what type of a loser he had mistakenly married. Now since my own real sister,
the still very beloved mother of my children and one of my plenty caregivers
when I lived in Ventura found it easier and less concerning not to have
anything to do with me, I'm imprisoned in a retirement home for ancient people
without any possibility to even look at my own money.
While in
a way I'm very upset for this, I really don't care too much because of what I
learned during my coma related NDE, or that we continue to exist also after we
die and we, ourselves decide what wrongs we did to others while living and
determine on our own how to spend our eternity as souls, this - of course - is
what any Christian Catholic believes - based on the teachings of Jesus Christ
(real person) - that is now confirmed beyond any doubt by official scientific
research done by true and famous researchers in different fields, now without
sounding like a "religious racist" I find it important to underline
that what we are discovering (and measuring) is the carbon copy of the Catholic
teachings as spoken and demonstrated directly by our creator made man into
Jesus Christ. So I put here something interesting I recently learned DIRECTLY FROM MY PHILOSOPHER FRIEND IACOPO.
I want to describe my idea pointing out some issues that allow me to define it more precisely. I understand that for those who do not lend confidence to it, these issues represent useless fantasies, but at least they can make their criticism without relying on wrong prejudices.
A good example to easy explain the basic idea of this hypothesis is to compare our world to a movie in which, thanks to a special effect, all roles are played by the same actor, so able to immerse itself in every character without revealing any personal trait. This means that I preclude the existence of any embedded information in this "shared I": it's not something that can exist outside of one of our common "earthly lives", it's just a "property of being percipient" that the matter expresses in some structures sufficiently complex, such as in men, but also in animals, and perhaps it could be up to
a single cell.
Considering the mind as a property that emerges from the matter is an already existing thesis and is widely shared: the only statement that I want to add is that its interpretation, from the subjective point of view, must be reflected in the acknowledgment that the subject experiencing the perception is always the same "I" that everyone experiences as individual "I". Therefore, instead of referring to a shared "I", it's more appropriate to refer to a "myself-ness" property, which manifests the same in each "perceiver subject". In this paper I use the word "I" for convenience of exposition, but put in mind that I consider conceptually wrong to figure it as an entity independent from the lives that express it.
My attitude is deliberately "minimalist", so I avoid taking positions on issues that, even if connected to questions of conscience, are not essential to my hypothesis, as the limit of complexity required to define "living" a physical structure, or about the existence of the "free will", even if the example of the movie with a single actor may suggest that it is impossible.
The difficulty to conceive how a single actor can not only act, but also to improvise during a performance in which he plays all the characters are tied to our need to imagine his interpretations as done "one after the other". We have no problem imagining that with a skillful editing we can make a movie with only one actor, but we cannot conceive how the same could also be realized as a show of improvisational theater.
The same problem also arises when we try to consider the "sequence of our lives". If my own "I" will also experience all the other lives, what are the lives that I have lived yet? What is my next life? In the metaphor of the actor, the scene is the entire pace-time where our lives take place, and we are not permitted to presume the existence of "absolute time" in which them can be ordered. In the movie example, the order in which the actor plays the individual parts of the movie superimposed during editing, is irrelevant, and cannot be deduced simply by watching the movie. So also the "sequence of our lives" cannot be inferred from any information traceable in our physical world.
We must consider the problem as an expression of our need to imagine the events in a temporal order. I think there is an appropriate analogy with the famous "double slit experiment", whose description is available in the link below, where is not allowed to ask what exact path each electron follows from its emission to its detection on the final screen, we can only note that it is influenced by the presence of both slits.
Finally, I want to make a clear distinction from solipsism, for which the existence of others cannot be proved, and therefore considers the other individual life as an illusion without a true reality, as if all other living beings were robots without a true awareness. I consider this point of view naive and harmful. I would simply note that just recognizing the difficulties that we face every day, makes it impossible to deny the existence of a "will" as opposed to ours. In my proposal, every other "will"
is identified with a different expression of my same "I", but because every physical and mental characteristics is defined entirely by the physical structure in which it occurs, it is inevitable that the same "I" each time expresses a different will, if only for the instinct of personal survival.
If we concede to acknowledge an "equivalence principle", for which our "present life" did not have any "special" feature when compared to any other life, we must also exclude the possibility that the "I" can somehow "choose" to live only a few lives, or has the opportunity to repeat "ad lib" the experience of a particular life, as we are not allowed to assume any awareness possible outside of a physical "normal" life. But from this principle of equivalence can be deduced also that all the lives that interact in the same space-time must be considered as part of a "unity of experimentation" that the "I" must experience as a whole set, without any exception. This is experience that distinguishes the "reality" from a dream or hallucination: the fact that the "I" must experience the same event from the different points of view of all the living beings who participate.
A good example to easy explain the basic idea of this hypothesis is to compare our world to a movie in which, thanks to a special effect, all roles are played by the same actor, so able to immerse itself in every character without revealing any personal trait. This means that I preclude the existence of any embedded information in this "shared I": it's not something that can exist outside of one of our common "earthly lives", it's just a "property of being percipient" that the matter expresses in some structures sufficiently complex, such as in men, but also in animals, and perhaps it could be up to
a single cell.
Considering the mind as a property that emerges from the matter is an already existing thesis and is widely shared: the only statement that I want to add is that its interpretation, from the subjective point of view, must be reflected in the acknowledgment that the subject experiencing the perception is always the same "I" that everyone experiences as individual "I". Therefore, instead of referring to a shared "I", it's more appropriate to refer to a "myself-ness" property, which manifests the same in each "perceiver subject". In this paper I use the word "I" for convenience of exposition, but put in mind that I consider conceptually wrong to figure it as an entity independent from the lives that express it.
My attitude is deliberately "minimalist", so I avoid taking positions on issues that, even if connected to questions of conscience, are not essential to my hypothesis, as the limit of complexity required to define "living" a physical structure, or about the existence of the "free will", even if the example of the movie with a single actor may suggest that it is impossible.
The difficulty to conceive how a single actor can not only act, but also to improvise during a performance in which he plays all the characters are tied to our need to imagine his interpretations as done "one after the other". We have no problem imagining that with a skillful editing we can make a movie with only one actor, but we cannot conceive how the same could also be realized as a show of improvisational theater.
The same problem also arises when we try to consider the "sequence of our lives". If my own "I" will also experience all the other lives, what are the lives that I have lived yet? What is my next life? In the metaphor of the actor, the scene is the entire pace-time where our lives take place, and we are not permitted to presume the existence of "absolute time" in which them can be ordered. In the movie example, the order in which the actor plays the individual parts of the movie superimposed during editing, is irrelevant, and cannot be deduced simply by watching the movie. So also the "sequence of our lives" cannot be inferred from any information traceable in our physical world.
We must consider the problem as an expression of our need to imagine the events in a temporal order. I think there is an appropriate analogy with the famous "double slit experiment", whose description is available in the link below, where is not allowed to ask what exact path each electron follows from its emission to its detection on the final screen, we can only note that it is influenced by the presence of both slits.
Finally, I want to make a clear distinction from solipsism, for which the existence of others cannot be proved, and therefore considers the other individual life as an illusion without a true reality, as if all other living beings were robots without a true awareness. I consider this point of view naive and harmful. I would simply note that just recognizing the difficulties that we face every day, makes it impossible to deny the existence of a "will" as opposed to ours. In my proposal, every other "will"
is identified with a different expression of my same "I", but because every physical and mental characteristics is defined entirely by the physical structure in which it occurs, it is inevitable that the same "I" each time expresses a different will, if only for the instinct of personal survival.
If we concede to acknowledge an "equivalence principle", for which our "present life" did not have any "special" feature when compared to any other life, we must also exclude the possibility that the "I" can somehow "choose" to live only a few lives, or has the opportunity to repeat "ad lib" the experience of a particular life, as we are not allowed to assume any awareness possible outside of a physical "normal" life. But from this principle of equivalence can be deduced also that all the lives that interact in the same space-time must be considered as part of a "unity of experimentation" that the "I" must experience as a whole set, without any exception. This is experience that distinguishes the "reality" from a dream or hallucination: the fact that the "I" must experience the same event from the different points of view of all the living beings who participate.
Thursday, April 02, 2015
JEHOVAH
Goddamned, last night I figured out that the God creator
I've been referring to here is named Jehovah, not the God I've been talking
about (ourselves), in fact has anyone
bothered to count the times that the words "revenge" and "kill"
appear in the Catholic literature? I did and it's simply astonishing, in fact
I'm thinking that that God (not our creator
Jehovah) must be Italian like me, in fact I even had to change my way to
express my anger or frustration because we Italians say "I'm going to kill
you" even when a child (of yours) eats too much jam or plays with
something dangerous.
My adored son Brent used to take me by the word and used to
fear that I was going to really kill someone else, so I stopped to say something
so natural when a real Italian expresses anger or frustration.
Now I understand very well the existence of so many atheists (complete absence of
self-confidence) and the presence of the "apocryphal gospels", that to me are all what
makes the new Testament, how can we believe an incorrect translation of what
few (4) shepherds remembered and wrote down in Palestine 2,000 years ago?
Please don't think that I may referring to the " Jehovah
witnesses" because not only I know nothing of them and their beliefs, but
very much also because they have never been mentioned in my talks with those
already in the afterlife.
I just want to clarify that both Jehovah (our creator) and
God (ourselves) are real simply because we are surrounded by the creations of Jehovah
and our lives are affected (in positive and in
negative) by God.
That's the very God who's going to determine our eternal
destiny after we die, especially if we don't correct our wrongs done to
others before we pass over
My post here doesn't take away any importance to the Holy
Bible (old testament) because it truly contains the word of Jehovah, as proven
by the recent discovery of the Red Sea Scrolls http://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/?locale=en_US and by much of the content of
the bible (old testament in particular).
Now that I truly hope to have clarified this difference I
invite my readers (you) to go to the links of the sites I put below and be
prepared for my future post about the Vatican monarchy (or empire) soon.
- http://www.ministrysamples.org/excerpts/JEHOVAH-GOD-IN-ETERNITYTHE-CREATOR.HTML
- http://www.datehookup.com/Thread-1016482.htm
- http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08329a.htm
- http://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/draw-close/power/the-creator/
- http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Names_of_G-d/YHVH/yhvh.html
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah
- http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/deadsea.html
- http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/who-wrote-the-dead-sea-scrolls-11781900/?no-ist
- http://www.timesofisrael.com/nine-tiny-new-dead-sea-scrolls-come-to-light/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)