Labels

Monday, November 23, 2015

2001: A Space Odyssey


Here-s another of my movie reviews that - given my total absence of anything to do all day long – makes me want to say this about the movie that most has fascinated me and that goes in the face of the woman I’m still married to.
  2001: A Space Odyssey is one  my favorite sci-fi of all time, I’ve committed far too many hours of my life watching it and I’m now here to share my thoughts on what the ending means. 2001 has been puzzling viewers since the day it came out and probably will forever continue to puzzle people until humans are so advanced that we’ll become “Starchildren” like Dave himself (if that’s possible anyway).
There are many questions surrounding 2001 that have to be answered to figure out the ending like, what is the monolith? Why did it appear in every step of human evolution? What in the world even happened in the last 30 minutes of the film? Luckily for you, I’m here to – hopefully – answer all of those questions and more with this article.
I’ll start with the monolith. With all of the evidence the film gives to us it, suggests that the monolith is some sort of tool that a highly advanced alien civilization has sent to Earth to progress the evolution of humans. Stanley Kubrick uses the song ‘Requiem’ by Gregory Ligeti to not only create a chilling mood but also give the monolith a voice. The sounds of ‘Requiem’ can be heard in five parts of the film: the black screen before the movie starts, the Dawn of Man sequence, the sequence with the astronauts on the moon, the ending of the mission to Jupiter and the ending of the film itself when Dave is on the bed with the monolith towering over him.
This music is the monolith’s voice speaking to whoever it is facing. By having ‘Requiem’ play over the black screen at the beginning of the film Kubrick is actually showing us the first monolith even though it is too close for you to actually see the shape. Think about it. Doesn’t the black screen go on for a little too long? That was done intentionally by Kubrick. This is the monolith speaking to the audience themselves which suggest that we’re about to witness a film so grand and so magnificent that it will open up our eyes to things we’ve never even thought possible. I know that all seems fairly pretentious and it would be, if it wasn’t true but such is the genius of Stanley Kubrick.
All right, now that I’ve explained the monolith and what its purpose serves I can explain the ending in detail. 2001 is the story of human evolution itself from the beginning (or monkeys, as per MY M. ) to the end and the ending of the film is Kubrick’s version of what the next step of human evolution looks like (too bad he didn’t live to see the actual 2001). The part of the movie that people start to get confused at,  is the “Stargate” sequence right after Dave defeats HAL and learns of the reason he’s been sent to Jupiter. This is where the monolith appears to him and the “Stargate” sequence begins.
What is actually happening in this scene is Dave is being transported to what is basically a zoo for all the different forms of life that the monolith has come in contact with and is advancing (more on this in a minute). As Dave is being transported light years into the universe the monolith shows to him things that he’s never even had the ability to see for himself. He sees other planets and cosmic phenomena that mankind had no idea even existed. There’s even one scene during the “Stargate” sequence which appears like it could even be the monolith showing to Dave the big bang.
The whole sequence is also contrasted by Dave’s eye as it continues to blink and change colors emphasizing this new wave of knowledge(Ui).
Once Dave has been through the “Stargate” and has made his way into the alien’s zoo like containment suite for him, he begins to age. The reason I call where he is, a zoo is because there are subtle hints that suggest this, like the noises in the background from strange creatures and his location in general. The room Dave is in,  looks like a mix of Victorian furniture but with a very sterile modern look to it as well. This is because the aliens have designed the room to look familiar to Dave so he feels as comfortable as possible. This is the same thing we do with the animals in zoos all around the world.
It was a genius decision on Kubrick’s part to never actually show the aliens form because, for all we know, they are so advanced that they probably don’t have any resemblance to humans at all. By not showing the aliens Kubrick allows the monolith to be our gateway to them when it appears to Dave on his death bed in his suite. The whole time Dave has been here he’s been aging and learning.
Right before he dies he points to the monolith is the same fashion that Adam is pointing to God in da Vinci’s The Creation of Adam Sistine Chapel painting. This is done on purpose to make the connection that, in the world of 2001, there is no God and the aliens are the highest form of being (to Iacopo's and to my wife's satisfaction).
This is where most viewers, myself included, really get lost in the film on the first viewing. After Dave points to the monolith he is transformed into the “Starchild” which is a glowing fetus like being but also has the appearance of a man in the face. After this scene Dave is sent back to Earth by the monolith and the film ends as Dave, -now the “Starchild" - looks on at our planet.

The reason the “Starchild” was sent back to Earth is because the monolith has completed its duty of advancing human life to its evolutionary limits so it sent the “Starchild” back to continue its work. In the last 30 minutes of the film Dave is given all the knowledge of the universe (cumulative) and has been transformed into an immortal, all knowing being. Dave is now the film’s version of God sent back to advance our race further than we ever could have by ourselves.

  1. http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/2001-the-monolith-and-the-message
  2. http://www.collativelearning.com/2001%20chapter%202.html
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_2001:_A_Space_Odyssey

No comments: