Labels

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

MY PARALLEL UNIVERSE



A parallel universe is a hypothetical self-contained reality co-existing with one's own. A specific group of parallel universes is called a "multiverse", although this term can also be used to describe the possible parallel universes that constitute reality.
The term reality fascinates my mind to no end, it’s tremendously related to the quantum mechanics and about this I want to share the way I figured out how to explain the famous Schrödinger cat experiment in fact you may have heard the thought experiment of Schrödinger’s cat, a spooky animal who lives in a closed box. The act of opening the box allows us to follow one of the possible future histories of our cat, including one in which it is both dead and alive. The reason this seems so impossible is simply because our human intuition is not familiar with it.
But it is entirely possible according to the strange rules of quantum mechanics. The reason that this can happen is that the space of possibilities in quantum mechanics is huge. Mathematically, a quantum mechanical state is a sum (or superposition) of all possible states. In the case of the Schrödinger’s cat, the cat is the superposition of “dead” and “alive” states. This very strange concept has made it much easier for me to understand the idea of the parallel universes (that now I definitely love!).
In fact scientists now believe there may really be a parallel universe - in fact, there may be an infinite number of parallel universes, and we just happen to live in one of them.

These other universes contain space, time and strange forms of exotic matter. Some of them may even contain you, in a slightly different form.

Astonishingly, scientists believe that these parallel universes exist less than one millimeter away from us. In fact, our gravity is just a weak signal leaking out of another universe into ours.
This is the concept that’s given to me the amazing idea that my accident has thrown me in a parallel universe, where I lost my mobility, family (overseas too) and job.
In fact I’m still in NH in reality in another universe, where I’ve become the president of the US subsidiary of the previous Italian company I was working at, I’m not divorced, my treasures are going to great colleges in Boston and Michele still loves me like the day I married her.
One of the amazing beautiful capacities of our brain is that once you become convinced of something, it comes to you as a dream when you are sleeping. As far as I’m concerned I convinced myself that while I’m sleeping I have glimpses of my life in that (parallel) universe.
Now, it’s obvious that on the background of all of this, there’s the complete ignorance of what our brain is capable of (I bet, we have just started to learn how it’s made with the Obama’s brain mapping project).
Maybe I could convince myself not to ever had any accident, so tomorrow afternoon I’ll go for a jog around town………..
However what’s absolutely true that the quantum discovery of consciousness has given scientific proof that what we see and feel is just a minimal fraction of what really surround us, i.e. our brain processes 4 billion of information per second while we can do about 2,000 in the same amount of time, so who can say that I’m still running in NH now? and who can say that we have the awareness of our reality (whose reality? Mine or yours?).
These quantum theories never stop fascinating me and I can’t see what or when I’ll let them go, anyway enjoy my videos and links.


  1.  http://www.strangerdimensions.com/2013/05/24/4-weird-clues-that-parallel-universes-exist/
  2. http://www.space.com/18811-multiple-universes-5-theories.html
  3. http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/600893/Professor-Stephen-Hawking-black-holes-could-be-portals-to-a-PARALLEL-UNIVERSE
  4. http://www.businessinsider.com/do-we-live-in-a-parallel-universe-2015-4
  5. http://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-how-you-can-figure-out-if-you-re-living-in-a-multiverse
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_universe_(fiction)

Monday, January 16, 2017

THE PRIMACY OF CONSCIOUSNESS



The fundamental nature of reality is actually consciousness. It may be the fundamental essence of the Universe. Many have made such claims from metaphysical perspectives, but the possibility has always been ignored by scientists. The problems the materialist scientific worldview has with consciousness and it proposes an alternative world view which, rather than contradicting science, makes new sense of much of modern physics. This presents a reasoned argument that shows how they are pointing towards the one thing science has always avoided considering - the primary nature of consciousness.
Anyone can find thousands of websites that explain what consciousness is and as for my blogger, given that I’ve talked about it here already, I can only add that a good analogy of consciousness is explained based on work by the Italian Giulio Tononi.
Imagine the difference between the image of an apple to your brain and a digital camera. The raw image is the same whether on a camera screen or in your head. The camera treats each pixel independently and doesn’t recognize an object. Your brain, however, will combine parts of the image to identify an object, that it is an apple and that it is food. Here, the camera can be seen as ‘unconscious’ and the brain as ‘conscious’.
Then there’s the whole concept that our entire universe is conscious itself and this makes our human consciousness very connected (or entangled) to our mind, that half of the scientific world is now trying to locate in our brain, or in the center of the universe. I invite my readers to spend some time going to the websites I linked below and know that sooner than later I’ll give a good indication to what the eternal existence of those who’ve been costing me absurd amounts of money is going to be.


  1.  https://www.scienceandnonduality.com/if-everything-is-consciousness-is-everything-conscious/
  2. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-consciousness-universal/#
  3. http://www.livescience.com/47096-theories-seek-to-explain-consciousness.html
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness

Sunday, January 15, 2017

FRUSTRATIONS

I put below the text of an email that – among the other dozens I had exchanged in 2004 with the Ian who is now heading the drive to have the AU-FDA to approve the use of Perispinal Enbrel at least in that country (“this will NEVER happen here in the USA, the Big Pharma has too much to lose”) had told me that Michael (the “criminal” that Michele had threatened to report to the FBI) who tried to procure little Enbrel to me from Venezuela, where it’s about an OTC med. – convinced me that this “impossible” for me to receive a simple treatment keeps not only making me pay someone (grrrr......) to make it impossible to go after my dream, but that in addition keeps me forced to use glasses with prisms to reduce my “left field cut”, for someone like me who was among the first in Italy to use contact lenses, this is yet another insult that both my real Italian sister (Anna) and my Queen (still) beloved wife (Michele) decided it best to have somebody who charged me (only) $80.000 to make it truly impossible for me to receive this treatment in nearby LA.
Here the email:


On 17/04/2014, at 11:38 AM, Carlo Lingiardi wrote:
I sincerely thank you very much Ian, I was afraid to have bothered you too much with my constant questions and doubts because it drives me completely crazy that something exists to improve TBI damage but nobody wants to even try it nor believes in what the PubMed makes public, I’m now struggling with my sight, I’ve been going to opticians with expertise in people who had TBI and I’m dreaming that the “simple” Enbrel might be able to repair my occipital lobe that’s the reason why I have such a definite field cut in my vision on the left side, that everyone can measure but only my very first optician in Valencia, CA was able to adjust, so now not only I remain prisoner of my wheelchair but I can’t see well anymore.
I truly struggle to believe that a “simple Enbrel treatment” is this impossible to even attempt. In my (broken) mind I would make it like taking the aspirin for a cold.
Carlo
All I can I say now (only 12 years later) is that given that our new president “owes nothing to anyone” he might become the “agent of change” that will make this “miraculous treatment” open to every MD in this country (sorry for the too few patent holders).

On 18/04/2014, at 4:38 pm, Ian replied:

Eye deficits are included in the concept.

Professor Ian C.
Research School of Biology
Australian National University

Canberra


Saturday, January 14, 2017

WE ARE GODS


In the Holy Bible - genesis – is written that God made men “in his image and likeness”, then when he became man, he was Jesus.
Let’s forget about the fact that I did meet with him, I now know what provoked my accident with all of the losses I had.
It was just the owner and CEO (Giancarlo) of my previous employer of the company based in NH who hated me so much that his (very strong) mind/consciousness sent very negative waves of hatred in my direction – in fact I was already planned to become the president of the US subsidiary, since the current one was about to retire.
Since I left there have been at least 3 different presidents of such subsidiary – all from pretty important European ski companies who lasted at most one winter season, primarily for their inability to speak Italian.
I was therefore “the chosen one” not only because Italian born, but very much too because I used go to the mother company in Italy (not far from Venice) twice each year and I had developed good relationships with many employees in the Italian headquarters.
In other words my determination to bring Michele back to CA had me resign from my current employment in NH where I was already chosen to bring forward decades of success.
This meant that the very powerful founder and owner of that company sent very bad thoughts my way, while I was probably in my weakest time I ever lived in (very personal reasons that I may never say them here).
I put this thought together with the idea of what the bible says and I understood that the God we refer to is simply ourselves and with evolution we’ll be making what today are called miracles (or what science cannot explain yet).
In following this idea (we are Gods), I made a very quick Google search in the internet and I’m glad to say that I’m not the only one who thinks so.
In a very near future I’ll talk about the fact that Iacopo is truly correct in something he says, even if for different reasons than mine.


  1.  https://www.lds.org/topics/becoming-like-god?lang=eng
  2. http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=11&article=1221
  3. http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/search-the-scriptures-daily/read/articles/can-man-actually-become-a-god-14334.html
  4. http://wordofmessiah.org/messianic-resources/messianic-answers-to-jewish-questions-sam-nadler/how-can-a-man-become-god/
  5. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/hay-festival/11627386/Humans-will-become-God-like-cyborgs-within-200-years.html
  6. https://answersingenesis.org/who-is-god/creator-god/man-the-image-of-god/
  7. https://www.gotquestions.org/you-are-gods.html
  8. http://www.christianitytoday.com/iyf/advice/faithdoubt/why-did-god-create-man.html
  9. http://www.exchangedlife.com/2012/10/19/why-does-the-bible-say-that-we-are-gods/

Friday, January 13, 2017

QUANTUM THEORY SUGGESTS CONSCIOUSNESS MOVES ON AFTER DEATH



This concept has been labeled as “BIOCENTRISM” by Dr. Lanza
Modern physics and neuroscience are venturing into this once hallowed ground, and radically changing our ideas of life after death.
It probably wasn't long after ancient people developed a belief in the afterlife that they began trying to contact those who had crossed over to the other side.
Roman necromancers believed that it was easiest to reach the dead in caverns and near volcanoes, which they believed to be passageways to the underworld.
Albert Einstein said “Now Besso has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me. That means nothing. People like us … know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
New evidence continues to suggest that Einstein was right – death is an illusion.
We believe in death because we’ve been taught we die. Also, of course, because we associate ourselves with our body and we know bodies die. End of the story. But biocentrism – a new theory of everything – tells us death may not be the terminal event we think. Amazingly, if you add life and consciousness to the equation, you can explain some of the biggest puzzles of science. For instance, it becomes clear why space and time – and even the properties of matter itself – depend on the observer. It also becomes clear why the laws, forces, and constants of the universe appear to be exquisitely fine-tuned for the existence of life.
Consider the weather ‘outside’: You see a blue sky, but the cells in your brain could be changed so the sky looks green or red. In fact, with a little genetic engineering we could probably make everything that is red vibrate or make a noise, or even make you want to have sex like with some birds (or cows, horses or any other animal you can think of). You think its bright out, but your brain circuits could be changed so it looks dark out. You think it feels hot and humid, but to a tropical frog it would feel cold and dry. This logic applies to virtually everything. Bottom line: What you see could not be present without your consciousness.
In truth, you can’t see anything through the bone that surrounds your brain. Your eyes are not portals to the world. Everything you see and experience right now – even your body – is a whirl of information occurring in your mind. According to biocentrism, space and time aren’t the hard, cold objects we think. Wave your hand through the air – if you take everything away, what’s left? Nothing. The same thing applies for time. Space and time are simply the tools for putting everything together.

Consider the famous two-slit experiment. When scientists watch a particle pass through two slits in a barrier, the particle behaves like a bullet and goes through one slit or the other. But if you don’t watch, it acts like a wave and can go through both slits at the same time. So how can a particle change its behavior depending on whether you watch it or not? The answer is simple – reality is a process that involves your consciousness.
Or consider Heisenberg’s famous uncertainty principle. If there is really a world out there with particles just bouncing around, then we should be able to measure all their properties. But you can’t. For instance, a particle’s exact location and momentum can’t be known at the same time. So why should it matter to a particle what you decide to measure? And how can pairs of entangled particles be instantaneously connected on opposite sides of the galaxy as if space and time don’t exist? Again, the answer is simple: because they’re not just ‘out there’ – space and time are simply tools of our mind.
Death doesn’t exist in a timeless, spaceless world. Immortality doesn’t mean a perpetual existence in time, but resides outside of time altogether.
Researchers stretched the distance the other photon took to reach its own detector. However, they could add a scrambler to prevent it from collapsing into a particle. Somehow, the first particle knew what the researcher was going to do before it happened – and across distances instantaneously as if there were no space or time between them. They decide not to become particles before their twin even encounters the scrambler. It doesn’t matter how we set up the experiment. Our mind and its knowledge is the only thing that determines how they behave. Experiments consistently confirm these observer-dependent effects.
Of course, we live in the same world. But critics claim this behavior is limited to the microscopic world. But this ‘two-world’ view (that is, one set of physical laws for small objects, and another for the rest of the universe including us) has no basis in reason and is being challenged in laboratories around the world. Pairs of vibrating ions were coaxed to entangle so their physical properties remained bound together when separated by large distances (“spooky action at a distance,” as Einstein put it).
We generally reject the multiple universes of Star Trek as fiction, but it turns out there is more than a morsel of scientific truth to this popular genre. One well-known aspect of quantum physics is that observations can’t be predicted absolutely. There are an infinite number of universes and everything that could possibly happen occurs in some universe. Death does not exist in any real sense in these scenarios. All possible universes exist simultaneously, regardless of what happens in any of them.
Life is an adventure that transcends our ordinary linear way of thinking.
Robert Lanza has published extensively in leading scientific journals. His books “Biocentrism” and “Beyond Biocentrism” lay out the scientific argument for his theory of everything.
Once again Iacopo and I give different words to the same thing, or what I call the soul, is called by Iacopo Consciousness, that might be correct too, given the latest researches of Quantum physics.


  1. http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/is-death-an-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isnt-the-end/
  2. http://www.ancient-code.com/does-quantum-theory-prove-consciousness-moves-to-another-universe-after-death/
  3. http://lifeboat.com/blog/2016/10/beyond-space-time-quantum-theory-suggests-consciousness-moves-on-after-death
  4. http://www.learning-mind.com/quantum-theory-proves-that-consciousness-moves-to-another-universe-after-death/
  5. http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/10/13/beyond-space-time-quantum-theory-suggests-consciousness-moves-on-after-death/
  6. http://www.osoti.net/featured/quantum-theory-suggests-consciousness-moves-to-another-universe-after-death/ 

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

ABOUT THE HOLY SHROUD OF JESUS



When I came out of the coma I told to both my father and to my best business friend – who were there – that I had made an agreement with Jesus to return to be here on earth for the love I have for my two treasures, both my dad and friend are absolutely convinced that I wasn’t talking out of my “drunkenness” given by the two months in a coma, but my good friend Iacopo says that it’s the simple effect of my Catholic upbringing.
It’s funny that he says that Jesus existed for real, because my topic today is about the Holy Shroud that’s the true proof that Jesus wasn’t a simple Jew, son of a carpenter and of a woman considered to be a whore, he truly was God made into man, simply because the Holy Shroud has been tested for centuries by the most advanced and expert scientists and researchers who used the most advanced and sophisticated instruments, but there’s still no explanation whatsoever of any possible way it could have been done (especially about 2.000 years ago).
In my (broken) mind this shroud is the proof not only that Jesus truly existed, but that he wasn’t really human and therefore all his miracles described in the new testament really were done by him in person – aside from coming back from his tomb (one of the pillars of the Catholic religion).
Lots of things have been said and done to prove that this shroud isn’t authentic, from saying that the image in it was painted centuries ago, to trying to replicate it with dead pigs (their flesh is almost human) cadavers and so on, the truth simply is that Jesus was our God creator (gravity in my humble opinion) and the shroud that was used to envelop his cadaver to leave his body in the tomb is probably the most objective and real proof of his true and otherworldly existence.
So, maybe my meeting with Jesus was the product of my growing up as a Catholic, but how can you (Iacopo) explain that I know that
·         Jesus had warned me that my coming back to life was going to be painful?
·         Why do I know so well what happens when we die and after?
·         How may I better understand the sacred scriptures?
·         How am I able to predict (with fairly good confidence) the eternal existence of people I know pretty well?
·         Why am I so interested in N.D.E. and in quantum physics (scientific confirmation of all the Catholic teachings)?
·         Why do I know of Jesus’s disappointment with the Vatican (empire, as I’ve been saying here)?
If you can answer with your innate intelligence any of these questions, I’m open to revise my thinking, BUT you best leave me speechless because having been in a coma with an N.D.E. has opened up my brain to an intelligence that’s even superior to what it used to be before my accident.
This explains the reason why my neuropsychological assessments cannot give intelligent results, but the souls of the ones who did them to me will take care of it.