Carlo Lingiardi

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

THE VATICAN TODAY

I’m hoping that my readers already know of my opinion about the Vatican (EMPIRE) but when I was checking my emails earlier this morning I received an extremely strange email message that truly scares me, this message is from somebody with the same name of my Venetian grandfather, Renato (?) about whom I posted twice here already in the past:

· http://lingiaca.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-holocaust-and-my-extended-family.html

· http://lingiaca.blogspot.com/2017/01/your-great-granpa-renato.html

The message has in it the link to a Youtube video in Italian, that I decided to translate best I can for you (no matter that’s a bit long):

Conclave is what’s used to express the protocol followed by the cardinals to elect a new pope this name comes directly from Latin “cum clave” in use since the XII cent. means that these high level priests of the church were all locked in a small room and deprived food, water and even air, to have them all feel good in making the decision about the name of the next pope truly fast. The Conclave has been mixed with political reasons (eeeehhhh the empire in action) since plenty centuries i.e. pope Gregorio XVI was made pope around the year 1.500 because Rome was under the threat to be invaded by Spanish bandits. It was learned later that it was a lie.

Several centuries later nothing really has changed, i.e. the “abdication” od pope Benedict XVI, the murder attempt against pope Giovanni Paolo II, the “mysterious” death of pope Luciani give the suspicion that the Vatican isn’t here to represent God and all the good of humanity the way it decides to do, it’s rather conditioned by an invisible strength that’s objectively evident, like secret services, organized criminals and organizations of this kind.

Truthfully today too the bishops in charge of naming the new pope lock themselves in a room following the extra omnes “everybody out” until the white smoke comes out of the St. Peter chimney will announce the election of the new pope (square in true fk…ing chaos) it’s somewhat pitiful that the Vatican hasn’t been the way Jesus had described his church to be – spiritual – in the 1.700 years the Vatican has represented the catholic empire (as I’ve been calling it) has shown – very clearly – that it’s able to influence other countries in their politic and economic paths, in addition having accumulated enormous wealth in arts, money through its own banks (I believe we are talking about trillions in such a small country that just produces fraternity feelings).

Now, the very interesting and revelatory part contained in this message:

1. There exists a big and clear difference between the catholic understanding that follows its own rules and the purely Christian one that instead strictly follows what Jesus advised to follow: Pope means father, where Jesus had categorically prohibited to ever use the word “father”, in fact Jesus said that “our only father is the one in the sky”, as a matter of fact when Jesus himself told to Peter that “because he you are Peter (rock) you’ll be the rock over which you’ll build my church”

Now, in the original Greek text of the Mark’s gospel the word “rock doesn’t exist, the word used to build the church of Jesus is truly “tefa” that’s the way Jesus used for the apostle Simon, the correct translation of what the church will be built on, isn’t rock, it’s more simply “stone”.

This means that Jesus didn’t say “you are Peter and over this Petra you’ll build my church” instead in a much simpler way these words come out like this (as written in Matthew’s gospel) “so I say that you are a stone and above this rock I’ll build my re-union, which is the true meaning of church, this word in fact truly means a meeting of people with common values and goals, in fact the apostle Simon has a pretty dominant visibility in all of the gospels, while Peter nowhere shows to have any kind of leadership whatsoever anywhere in any of the holy texts, he’s in fact accused of wrongdoings, punished etc. which confirms that he never was a pope, especially since it’s been established that the pope is Christ’s word on earth, therefore he’s never wrong and can never be disputed…….wanna dispute God now???

However when you think to the millions of people who died in 1.700 years with crusades, inquisition, holy wars, fights for power and all else that’s considered dirty and criminal and go against the teachings of Jesus who considered important the protection of human life at all costs and reciprocal respect

In John’s gospels written that Jesus once said that “truth will let you free”, this is when Peter defines the freedom for Catholics, we all are the stones to be used for the spiritual construction that isn’t in material possessions or here or there or up and down, it’s in our own hearts that we have and can define what we are all about.

Now, IF you would be interested AND offer a donation to patch up my ripped soul I could send the link to the original Youtube in Italian from which the complete text of this post comes from.

Sunday, October 27, 2019

It’s Christmas time...

As I read again my last post about a clear message directly received from Jesus, I’ve just decided that I understand the reason why I called all Catholics hypocrites and why this made me so very non-Christmas-like to write and post that message (now forever deleted).

So in order not to add more negativity to this “US commercialized holiday”, before going on with my predicted posts-topics about:

· quantum physics

· Jesus

· God

· holy shroud

· virgin Mary

That all and only will come out here IF I’ll find the right Youtube videos and/or websites to link in my support. Merry Christmas to you all my readers......

Really funny

Thursday, October 03, 2019

WE ARE STILL MONKEYS (part 2)

Yesterday I watched a documentary about the discovery, underwater of a very antique ship that contains instruments that had to be sent to a lab in London, to be scientifically analyzed to be sure that what the members of the underwater archeological team had found in a Greek vessel deep underwater – were right or wrong in their guesses.

Well, it turns out that the London researchers couldn’t understand how such very modern and accurate navigation instruments could have be imagined to be useful (especially for navigation) but be constructed too…….it turns out that people in those times people could use bronze and lead pretty much in the same way we have been using steel, aluminum and fiberglass in the past couple of centuries.

I said to myself: “Boy! What an interesting way start a research that can help me get involved with something both interesting and exciting today!!.”

In fact, I still remember well that when I was in high school (Liceo for me) I was “diseased” with the study of the ancient Greeks, but not just because of its philosophers …… (who created philosophy that we still study and use today, two thousand years later) But – I just learned that we knew that our planet is round 1.400 years before Columbus took his trip to the west to find the country that today is named after another Italian …A.Vespucci.

All I can say is that to my (injured) brain with its intelligence, culture and knowledge in history looks like not only keeps repeating itself but that as time goes by, our ability to think and imagine is much worse when compared to that of the people who lived 2.000 to 5.000 years ago…..not to mention our closest predecessors, the Neanderthal who lived just 250.000 years ago (my injured brain is unable to conceive such length of time).

After having spent a fair number of hours reading material available to all I can say that we – as a civilization - with all our technology, science and ability to modify for our own benefit everything we see and touch around ourselves, have developed in circles…….I’m sure that this will be obvious from the Youtubes and links posted here.

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

WE ALL ARE (STILL) MONKEYS!!

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Instead, monkeys and humans share a common ancestor from which both evolved around 25 million years ago. This evolutionary relationship is supported both by the fossil record and DNA analysis. Oct 4, 2011

Ferns first appear in the fossil record about 360 million years ago in the late Devonian period.

All modern humans share a common ancestor who lived around 200,000 years ago in Africa. Comparisons between known skin pigmentation genes in chimpanzees and modern Africans show that dark skin evolved along with the loss of body hair about 1.2 million years ago and that this common ancestor had dark skin

ver since the discovery of the Neanderthal fossils, expert opinion has been divided as to whether Neanderthals should be considered a separate species (Homo neanderthalensis) or a subspecies (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis) relative to modern humans.

Humans first appeared in the fossil record around 66 million years ago, soon after the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event that eliminated about three-quarters of plant and animal species on Earth, including most dinosaurs.

he earliest humans developed out of australopithecine ancestors after about 3 million years ago, most likely in Eastern Africa, most likely in the area of the Kenyan Rift Valley, where the oldest known stone tools were found.

The history of religion refers to the written record of human religious experiences and ideas. This period of religious history begins with the invention of writing about 5,200 years ago (3200 BCE). The prehistory of religion involves the study of religious beliefs that existed prior to the advent of written records.

Sometimes called the official religion of ancient Persia, Zoroastrianism is one of the world's oldest surviving religions, with teachings older than Buddhism, older than Judaism, and far older than Christianity or Islam. Zoroastrianism is thought to have arisen “in the late second millennium B.C.E.

Religious instincts. Religious instinct has been theorized by some scholars as a part of human nature - support for such a position being found in the fact that (as Talcott Parsons put it) “there is no known human society without something which modern social scientists would classify as religion”.

The Rig Veda of ancient Hinduism is estimated to have been composed between 1700–1100 BCE, which not only denotes it as one of the oldest known religious texts, but also one of the oldest written religious text which is still actively used in religious practice to this day, though no actual evidence of this text exists ..

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Mind & soul

As I’m deeply studying the concept of our consciousness, how we are all part of the Universal one and how – after we die – our consciousness re-joins the universal one, I stumbled upon the ideas of mind and soul (that Iacopo refuses it to be existent at all).

This is actually the very reason that drove me to spend few days into the study of this matter (even if related to very complex - for me -ideas such dualism and what someone such as Descartes elaborated on).

However I was lucky to find a Youtube that explains the mind in a good way:

In fact this helps me very much into attacking this subject otherwise complicated since the seventeenth (XVII) century, many philosophers and scientists were involved in the debate over this “simple” question: “What is the definition of the human mind and the human brain?”

One of the explanations for the mind is that: the mind is used to refer to the individual's thought process of reason and consciousness. ... Soul is the spiritual nature of man while mind is man's faculty of thinking and reasoning. 2. The soul is considered as the essence of man while the mind is in charge of man's consciousness and thought, while the "soul or spirit" is that part of us that enables us to be aware of ourselves. In other words it’s the essence of life, eternal and its substance lies outside the physical parameters of the Universe. Moreover, when in place in any physical body, it connects directly to and is our consciousness.

In short we have 'minds'. Typically humans are characterized as having both a mind (non-physical) and body/brain (physical). ... Dualism is the view that the mind and body both exist as separate entities. Descartes argues that there is a two-way interaction between mental and physical substances.

Very shortly we can say that brain and mind are not the same. ... Your mind is part of the invisible, transcendent world of thought, feeling, attitude, belief and imagination. The brain is the physical organ most associated with mind and consciousness, but the mind is not confined to the brain. The mind is the manifestations of thought, perception, emotion, determination, memory and imagination that take place within the brain. Mind is often used to refer especially to the thought processes of reason.

Now, after having read and studied way more than I need on this matter, I’ve decided (probably incorrectly) that the mind is what’s been called since the beginning of time (at least since Aristoteles) as soul.

I do realize that – given the wealth of websites dedicated to this matters – I have maybe too many Youtubes in this post, BUT I found so many great – and directly to my point – that’s been impossible to choose the ones to publish here and those to avoid, however please do spend some time to click on the links at the bottom they are truly the result of a pretty extensive research and choice.

Sunday, August 11, 2019

NON AVETE LE PALLE!!!

This is another small explanation of Italian culture and bi-millenarian culture (WOW it’s the 2019 already!!) when you hear a true Italian - born in Italy like me – (not in the USA) saying to someone else “mi hai rotto le palle – or coglioni” – in English: you broke my balls or testicles what this person is referring to is someone’s testicles (a male…..obviously) that are traditionally thought to be the testosterone producer glands in men’s and ….very importantly give courage, resistance to physical pain and a set of extremely refined (often from birth) combative skills to take care of himself and what he cares about, I need to add to this that any man with palle/coglioni, can easily and immediately “sniff” men who haven’t any (often from birth) I must say that this exactly what I believe of 2 men who have been braking my balls while stealing as much money as they can from me lately and try to force me to do or say something that without any balls they cannot in any way, shape or form will ever have the balls to come here to tell me in my angry face…………as a matter of fact my/human body has lost one ball (surgically removed due to a tumor....and here again NOTHING CAN KILL ME) but the one left because of my furious anger has taken over what he lost one was doing and since my anger has…..if anything……got surely worse my one remaining testicle fills up the ball-sack to the point that the skin of it is even stretched now, so I can say that my surviving testicle is about the size of a volleyball.

What makes this situation worrisome is that the only way to relax it to its “original size” is to confront in person those two losers without balls…..or balls the size of a peanut.

Maybe I’ll check once they’ll be on the floor……..after my “testosterone power-treatment”

Labels